Looks good to me, except should it really be targeted for Standards Track? 
Informational seems to make more sense.

--John

On Aug 17, 2012, at 12:58 PM, Murphy, Sandra wrote:

> The authors believe that the draft is ready for publication.  This announces 
> a two week last call.  The WGLC will end 31 Aug 2012.
> 
> Please report to the list whether you support publication of this draft or 
> not.
> 
> The draft is available at
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-01
> 
> The abstract says:
> 
>   This document provides an implementation report for RPKI Router
>   protocol as defined in [I-D.ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr].  The editor did not
>   verify the accuracy of the information provided by respondents or by
>   any alternative means.  The respondents are experts with the
>   implementations they reported on, and their responses are considered
>   authoritative for the implementations for which their responses
>   represent.  Respondents were asked to only use the YES answer if the
>   feature had at least been tested in the lab.
> 
> 
> 
> --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to