Thanks to Matt for an impressive amount of work. I encourage the working group to look at this draft right away.
This will be a major focus of our interim meeting on 29 Sep. --Sandy ________________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Matt Lepinski [[email protected]] Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 4:33 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [sidr] draft-ietf-bgpsec-protocol-05 I have submitted an -05 version of the BGPSEC protocol specification. This includes changes that we discussed at the meeting in Vancouver (including clarity on duplicate updates, as well as clarity that confederations MAY choose not to verify signatures from other members of the confederation). Additionally, I fleshed out the algorithm in Section 4.4 for converting from a BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute to an AS_PATH attribute. (And in general improved the text on how information in the BGPSEC_Path_Signatures attribute should be used in place of AS_PATH information whenever AS_PATH information is required.) Finally, I fixed a bug in the confederation solution (Section 4.3) that was discussed on the SIDR list shortly after the Vancouver meeting. The confederation solution now better mirrors the way confederations are handled in BGP-4 (non-BGPSEC). Oh, and I fixed a couple of stupid typos in the Bibliography, I am sure there are still a few other such typos sitting around in various sections, but I believe all of the outstanding technical issues have been addressed. - Matt Lepinski _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
