> The newest protocol draft came out on 7 Sep and I asked the working > group to "look at this draft right away" because it would be discussed > at the interim meeting. After eight days with no comments, a wglc > seemed a good idea. Sad that our lives need a wglc to produce > participation, but it is what it is.
i note that you got one actual reivew, which is good. the only other stuff i have seen is people telling the chairs what the process should be, embarrassing. i promise a detailed re-read in the next days. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
