On Nov 7, 2012, at 6:17 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:

>> which types of parties are expected to be subject to the relying party
>> agreement would also need to share the obtained information with
>> others? (others who would potentially be unaware of the RPA as well as
>> the CP and CPS, in all likelihood...?)
> 
> sita has cache and has agreed to arin's silliness.  rama, trying not to
> put load on CA publishers, rsyncs sita's cache and wants to validate it.
> hanuman rsyncs rama's cache, ...


In the above circumstance, how do rama and hanuman find and consider 
the terms and conditions of the CA's CP/CPS prior to building reliance
upon its surmised authentication and/or non-repudiation capabilities?

/John








_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to