Below are some comments on the draft. I also submitted my nits to the editors.

0) Based on the assumption that draft-newton-sidr-policy-qualifiers will be adopted because that's what the RIRs want should s1.2 or 1.5 also include some information about where it can be found? This information would be identical to the URI included in the policy qualifier?

1) s1.6: CP - Is it worth nothing that there might be another CP for the BPKI?

2) s4.6.1: Not sure if this needs to go here but don't we need to say something about not renewing certificates forever?

3) draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying describes the procedures for operator generated keys (i.e., those that are not router generated). A couple of questions come to mind:

a) Should the CPS point to that draft in s6.1.2 or will the CPS be updated when draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying is published?

b) draft-ietf-sidr-rtr-keying allows operators sign the private keys they generate and subsequently send back to the router. Should this be explicitly called out in s4.5.1. For s.4.5.2, is the returned signed-key an RPKI-Signed Object?

spt

On 2/21/13 11:30 PM, Chris Morrow wrote:
WG folks,
As the subject states, let's please start a WGLC poll for the document:
    draft-ietf-sidr-cps-01
    <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-cps-01>

with the abstract:
   "This document contains a template to be used for creating a
    Certification Practice Statement (CPS) for an Organization that is
    part of the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI), e.g., a
    resource allocation registry or an ISP."

So far the authors have made a few revisions, with updates based on
comments/feedback, at this time the document has been stable for more
than 6 months time, let's move this along if there are no further
issues/addendums/questions/appendixes.

thanks!
-chris
co-chair-1-of-3
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to