heas, > Whether anyone likes it, it has become a TE knob of sorts, in a protocol > with few such knobs, and many smaller transit providers rely upon it to > affect route selection for non-malicious reasons, such as to balance their > own transit links. Without providing an alternative, it will be crippling > to many to inhibit its use as such.
that is not exactly the qestion, thought i gives a hint. by "smaller transit providers rely on it" do you mean that the value is legitimately set or altered by other than the originating AS? if so, then signing it would be bad. if not, it could be good. so could you please clarify? randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
