I believe this work is important and should continue, and be adopted by the WG as a deliverable. RPKI has the capability to provide PKI assurance over information which lies outside of BGP, as well as informing BGP, and I think constructing the appropriate formalisms over signing of RPSL objects will materially enhance trust in the statements made in RPSL, relating to internet number resources.
I have no competency to work on this draft. I would encourage others to get involved. -George On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:07 AM, Murphy, Sandra <[email protected]>wrote: > The authors of the draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig have both indicated that they > see a need for this draft and are still interested in pursuing the work. > > But they both have been appointed to positions that put strong demands on > their time. > > Therefore, they would like some indication from the wg that the wg also is > interested in pursuing the work. > > And the co-chairs think it would be helpful to have an additional > author/editor on this draft. > > So. > > Please do state whether you believe the wg should continue work in this > area. Responses by 5 Sep, please. > > If you would be interested in serving as an additional author on this > draft, please do say so. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
