Hi Jac,
actually, I'm confused about the statemet on slide 4: "Different
validation states only happens when there is a less or more specific
route announced."
For example, ROA {1.2.0.0/16-24, AS 10}. BGP Update 1.2.0.0/16 with
origin AS 10 is valid, but the same prefix with origin AS 20 is invalid.
Can you clarify?
Thanks
matthias
--
Matthias Waehlisch
. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
. Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:[email protected] .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013, Jac Kloots wrote:
>
> Oke guys,
>
> I'm working on setting up a routing policy based upon origin validation.
> Having read the http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-origin-ops/
> draft I got confused.
>
> I've attached a ppt trying to make my problem clear. Am I making a thinking
> error here or doesn't it make any sense changing preference for valids and
> unknowns?
>
> Who's helping me out on this.
>
> Regards,
>
> Jac
>
>
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
