Hi, My opinion below..
On Nov 8, 2013, at 5:25 AM, "Murphy, Sandra" <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob posed a question to the room during the meeting on Tue (Nov 5) about the > publication draft. See slides at > http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-sidr-1.pdf. > > The question to the list is: > > Should the protocol be trimmed -- take out all of the “control” operations, > leaving just the <publish/> and <withdraw/> operations -- I prefer this, in standards-track. Small, to the point, and makes it feasible for other implementations and other documents to build on this. > or should the "control" operations be an optional sub-protocol? I am fine with this being described in another document. I don't understand it well enough to judge whether it's re-useable by other implementations so I am not sure about which track it should be in. > > What say ye? > > --Sandy > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
