Sandy, I support the addition of multiple publication points as working group item and hope to go quickly through the process.
Roque -------------------- Initial Comments: Section 2.1 (Roque) We received the request from the WG to add a blank line break between the URI section and the public key. You can see the example on section 3. of the draft-ietf-sidr-multiple-publication-points-00 document. Section 2.2: (Roque) I find this paragraph confusing: The trust anchor MUST be published at a stable URI. When the trust anchor is re-issued for any reason, the replacement CA certificate MUST be accessible using the same URI. I am not sure the meaning of "stable URI" in this context. Would it be "stable URI section"? or "stable rsync URI(s)"? (Roque) s/Becuase/Because On Feb 7, 2014, at 8:47 PM, "Murphy, Sandra" <[email protected]> wrote: > The authors of "draft-ietf-sidr-multiple-publication-points" proposed a new > direction for that draft that included: > > > - A "6490-bis" document that obsoletes RFC 6490 with the addition of multiple > operators in section 3 of the current document. > > > The wg having consented to that approach, the authors of RFC6490 produced a > new draft draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis that would serve as the 6490-bis. > > The authors of draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis have requested that the wg adopt > this draft as a working group work item. > > See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-sidr-rfc6490-bis-00, "Resource > Certificate PKI (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator". > > Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this > as a work item. Note that you do not need to comment on the content of this > draft at this time. You are asked to indicate if you think that this is work > that the wg should be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable starting > point. Adding whether you can/will review or not is useful. > > This adoption poll will end on Friday, 21 February, 2014. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
