So the draft does two things - adds a new PDU and makes some changes to the 
overall protocol function.

I would expect that adding a new PDU would be a new document, not a revision to 
the protocol document.  Would you agree?

Since you are changing the protocol function anyway, I can see the efficiency 
in making the changes together.  Of course, if there's agreement about one part 
and not about the other, there's some fate sharing.  Comment?

The new PDU assumes the wg agrees to the revision of the router cert draft.  
Correct?  So this is tied to progress of a revised router cert draft?  Is 
somebody already on board to provide that new draft?

--Sandy


_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to