The CPS was written well before 6916 was finished.
A reference to that RFC now makes sense.
Steve
On 4/14/14 10:43 AM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
And one "I forgot":
CAs and RPs SHOULD be capable of supporting a transition to allow for
the phased introduction of additional encryption algorithms and key
specifications,
Is this any different than the algorithm agility in RFC6916? If so, I'd think
a reference would be good. If not, could you explain?
--Sandy, speaking as regular ol' member
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
