Obviously, I also support this call for adoption, for the reasons George has outlined here.
Geoff On 29 Apr 2014, at 10:11 am, George Michaelson <[email protected]> wrote: > I would like to see the WG discuss validation. I think there are inherent > risks in the current model, which could be avoided if we had a more nuanced > understanding of the validity of any given resource under consideration. > > So as a co-author of this draft its hardly surprising I support adoption, > because I want us to have a real conversation. > > -George, speaking as co-author of the draft. > > > On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > The authors of draft-huston-rpki-validation-01.txt, RPKI Validation > Reconsidered, have requested wg adoption. > > See http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-rpki-validation-01. > > Please do respond to the list as to whether you support the wg adopting this > as a work item. You do not need to comment on the content of this draft at > this time. You are asked to indicate if you think that this is work that the > wg should be doing and whether this draft is an acceptable starting point. > Adding whether you can/will review or not is useful. > > Note that active support is required for adoption. Silence is a vote against > adoption. > > This adoption call will end on 9 May 2014. > > --Sandy, speaking as wg co-chair > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
