On May 12, 2014, at 16:03, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >> Would it make sense to have the name that goes in the router >> certificate then be something like “ROUTER-#-32_bit_BGP_Identifier” >> where the # gets incremented everytime there’s a new key? For those >> that love hard coded lengths this might be an issue if the # grows, >> but is that the only drawback? > > if you have to go down that path, and i am unsure of it, then use a > fixed length router# and wrap.
I could live with that make it like 000 an wrap 999. If you have to rekey that often …. > and keep in mind that bgp_id is unique only within an AS. yep that’s true. spt _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
