On Jul 07, 2014, at 19:42, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Geoff Huston <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> the header of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-08 says: >> "Updates: 6485 (if approved) " >> >> >> so I'm still confused about the two 6485 update drafts. >> >> > > > Ah. So your original question was: > >> >> Whats the relationship between this draft and draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis? > > So you want to know if bgpsec-algs is updating the original RFC6485 or > updating rfc6485bis?
draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs adds support for EC public keys & signature formats to RFC 6485 for BGPsec. If 6485bis is going to be updated to include these changes then draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs can go away but I didn’t think that was the plan. Assuming EC algs aren’t incorporated in 6485bis then draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs needs to update RFC 6485 or any document that obsoletes it. I’m happy to change the updates header info to “Updates: draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis (once approved)" though if that makes things crystal clear. spt _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
