A couple of comments here: - I have the feeling that it'd be good to begin referring to locators as just 'URIs' instead of insisting on them being 'rsync URIs'. If the group ever decides to address the subject of repository transport, and since we are revisiting 6490, we might save little work down the road.
- A two or more URI example would be a good addition. regards Carlos On 19/09/2014 00:46, [email protected] wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group > of the IETF. > > Title : Resource Certificate PKI (RPKI) Trust Anchor Locator > Authors : Geoff Huston > Samuel Weiler > George Michaelson > Stephen Kent > Filename : draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-01.txt > Pages : 9 > Date : 2014-09-18 > > Abstract: > This document defines a Trust Anchor Locator (TAL) for the Resource > Certificate Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI). > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis/ > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-01 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6490-bis-01 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
