On Oct 12, 2014, at 8:32 PM, Leo Vegoda <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Roque, > > Roque Gagliano (rogaglia) wrote: > > [...] > >> However, I am struggling with the relevance from a CA perspective of >> Section 7 (Communication from validators to objects signers regarding >> validation status). Validation is a local process done from RPs. There >> are many reasons why validation may fail and many of them good >> reasons. Are you expecting a massive Big Brother system of all validator >> reporting results back to IANA? > > No, we weren't envisaging that there would be a central repository of all > validation failure reports. I want to reiterate that we are seeking advice > on whether it is important for certificate owners and object signers to know > if validation fails because of something they have done. Have you looked at the RPSTIR work? http://sourceforge.net/projects/rpstir/ There's a large set of compliance tests in there. Is that what you were looking for? --Sandy > > I was thinking that letting the resource owner know that its certificate or > ROA failed validation and why could be helpful to the resource owner and > help minimize routing failures based on validation failures. > > Regards, > > Leo > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
