Brian,
I apologize for this very, very late comment. Your message from late
November
got lost in my inbox.
I worry that accommodating multiple signatures will cause confusion for
RPs. One would need to specify what to do if one sig fails, but other
succeed,
for example.
Steve
All,
Robert and I have found the time/energy to push this work to
completion. This version does not contain any substantive updates from
the -05, I simply got this version out to allow for discussion on it to
resume.
One question that I would like to discuss is the currently optional
"o" attribute. Robert feels it is not needed if the "c" attribute
references a RFC 3779-compliant certificate. I feel that the
flexibility of having multiple signatures allows for instances where
different parties own, for example, the prefix being advertised and the
ASN. I would appreciate feedback on this issue.
A follow-on version will address comments raised previously on the
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
