Interesting answer. John, my understanding of what I've read on the ARIN web site about transfer was that address space to be transferred had to be unused.
Did I read wrong? --Sandy On Mar 22, 2015, at 2:18 PM, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mar 20, 2015, at 2:10 PM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> John, >> I agree that the frequency of v4 resources might change as a result of >> exhaustion >> of that space on a regional level. A cursory look at the transfers listed at >> the URL >> you provided would support that projection. But, I'm especially interested >> seeing >> which transfers are for live vs.unused space, since the implications for the >> ordering of events are very different. I don't see that info on this page. >> ... > > Interesting question - this is not information that organizations need to > supply to ARIN during the transfer request process (at least at ARIN), so > it is not shown in the statistics. If someone wants to do little analysis > against routeviews/ripestat, it should be possible to derive such for past > transfers. (I'd advise against optimizing future mechanisms based on that > limited history, but it would still be interesting information to have...) > > /John > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
