The wglc for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-rfc6810-bis-03 ended just before IETF92. Then this energetic discussion followed the end of the wglc, but seems to have substance.
Do the authors have a clear picture of the changes needed to the draft to proceed with a new version? --Sandy On Apr 1, 2015, at 3:21 PM, Rob Austein <[email protected]> wrote: > David, I think a simpler way to express the semantics you want is just > to consider the protocol version number to be part of the session > identifier. That way, a version 0 session can never match a version 1 > session, by definition, full stop. > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
