On Apr 21, 2015, at 13:23, Richard Hansen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2015-04-21 02:24, Geoff Huston wrote: >> I am trying very hard to understand why or how such a change affects >> interoperability of running >> code that is based on this specification. So far I’ve been unable to think >> of an example >> that makes sense. > > I also fail to see how this affects interoperability, which is why I > submitted it as an editorial errata instead of a technical errata. This > change is about as significant as > <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?eid=3162>, except maybe > less so because people sometimes cite section numbers while nobody will > ever cite this particular line. > > If the change was technical and substantial, I would have submitted a > bis or update draft. > >> Could Richard kindly enlighten me as to why this is an important change? > > Someone unfamiliar with the SIDR working group might be confused by > mention of SIDR. (Just like someone stumbling across a typo might be > distracted a bit.) > > This is just a readability fix, nothing more. I think the more > important question is: Is the suggested change correct?
The document to which the words refers to is called: "An Infrastructure to Support Secure Internet Routing" and the short title in the header of the draft is: "RPKI Architecture" but I don’t think folks are going to be confused because they’re going to follow the [RFC6480] to the normative references and then do a lookup or just do a straight lookup on RFC 6480 so I’d probably just leave it. spt > -Richard > >> >> thanks, >> >> Geoff >> >> >> >> >>> On 20 Apr 2015, at 7:36 pm, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6485, >>> "The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for Use in the Resource Public >>> Key Infrastructure (RPKI)". >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> You may review the report below and at: >>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6485&eid=4340 >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Type: Editorial >>> Reported by: Richard Hansen <[email protected]> >>> >>> Section: 1 >>> >>> Original Text >>> ------------- >>> the SIDR Architecture >>> [RFC6480], >>> >>> >>> Corrected Text >>> -------------- >>> the RPKI Architecture >>> [RFC6480], >>> >>> >>> Notes >>> ----- >>> Neither "SIDR" nor "Secure Inter-Domain Routing" is mentioned in RFC6480. >>> RFC6480 is about the design of the RPKI, so "RPKI Architecture" seems like >>> a more appropriate fit. >>> >>> Instructions: >>> ------------- >>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please >>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or >>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) >>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. >>> >>> -------------------------------------- >>> RFC6485 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-algs-05) >>> -------------------------------------- >>> Title : The Profile for Algorithms and Key Sizes for Use in >>> the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) >>> Publication Date : February 2012 >>> Author(s) : G. Huston >>> Category : PROPOSED STANDARD >>> Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing >>> Area : Routing >>> Stream : IETF >>> Verifying Party : IESG >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
