On 2015-04-20 07:12, RFC Errata System wrote: > This is technically a technical change, as it would technically > affect implementation, but I believe in fact it is just a typo. Only > a very inexperienced implementor would put the RFC6485 algorithm OID > in the signature field of the POPOSigningKey.
I agree with the proposed change, and I agree that there's no real risk of an implementation getting it wrong. -Richard _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
