Andy,
The context for the discussion is address space transfer in the RPKI
context.
We don't have an RFC describing how to do that, AFAIK. So, when you say that
this is the scenario we have today, to what are you referring?
Steve
On Jul 15, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Stephen Kent <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Randy's view is that it is preferable to engineer a single solution
that is agnostic
about whether the address space is in use or not, even if that is a
more complex
solution. His rationale seems to be that its safer to treat all space
as in use, so as
to avoid the damage to users that arises if the entity transferring
the space can't
properly classify it properly.
Isn’t the “unused” scenario what we have today? Why do we need a
solution for something that is already being accomplished?
-andy
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
