On 5 Aug 2015, at 8:31, Stephen Farrell wrote: > - (In response to Ben's comment:) Assuming this change > only represents a change to the means to get more > anchor information, after you have the public key, and > that any additional into is protected with the key I > don't think there's any real security change here - this > is basically like having an anycast address for the host > in the current URI (from the security POV). If that's > wrong please do correct me.
I believe you are right, and that addresses my concern. Thanks! Ben. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
