This conversation seems to have come to a close. The wg chairs see wg consensus as follows:
The problem is real enough to merit a protocol change. The change is to cover more raw info in the signatures, rather than signature chaining only, along the lines of http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07258.html (see also the new archiving tool https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/sXUj7lgieri0Wrv5PK5u7PfLtxc). In addition, maintaining ordering was also noted as important to some http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07261.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07270.html http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr/current/msg07271.html The authors of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-13 are requested to submit a revised version of the draft. The changes are significant enough that the revised draft will go through a wglc, focussed on the changes for this issue, so shorter than normal. —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
