Other than that, no issues with the doc - it's in good shape.
Minor nits sent separately to the editors. -- Sam Weiler _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
The doc cites a bunch of i-d's. Under previous practice, that would have
left it languishing in the RFC Editor queue waiting for the others. If
that were the practice now, I would suggest we hold it and release all of
the docs as a group, which would permit later changes to this doc if
needed. I think current practice does allow citing i-d's (though version
numbers need to be specified), but I'm wondering if we wouldn't be better
off waiting. This is the first BGPsec doc many will read - I would prefer
to have it be correct and complete even if we make changes in the other
docs along the way.
- Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/... Samuel Weiler
