On Oct 27, 2015, at 11:57, Samuel Weiler <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I have read the draft and have no objections to it going forward.
>
> Suggestions:
>
> Section 5 talks about some of the requirements for (future) algorithm and key
> size agility, but says "The recommended procedures to implement such a
> transition of key sizes and algorithms is not specified in this document."
> (sic) I think it would be good to cite some discussion of that, e.g. section
> 6 of -protocol. (I'm not saying that section 6 of -protocol is complete or
> great, but it may be the best set of words we have right now.)
Fair ‘nuff I’ll add “, see Section 6 in [ID.sidr-bgpsec-protocol] for more
information."
> Nail down the initial codepoint in the IANA registry (this doc is creating
> the registry, so we can be specific). I suggest "1”.
Do you think this is a blocking issue?
I’d prefer to have IANA make the allocation and stick it in the document when
it’s approved. YMMV on this but since the registry isn’t yet created I’d
rather not set an example that others might follow of making up registry names
and numbers in drafts that have not yet reached consensus.
To expand on this issue though should we also reserve the low value and the
high value too? i.e.,
OLD (please forgive the formatting):
Digest Signature Algorithm Suite Specification
Algorithm Algorithm Identifier Pointer
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| SHA-256 | ECDSA P-256 | TBD | RFC 5480 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
NEW:
Digest Signature Algorithm Suite Specification
Algorithm Algorithm Identifier Pointer
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Reserved | Reserved | 0x0 | This draft |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| SHA-256 | ECDSA P-256 | TBD | RFC 5480 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Unassigned | Unassigned | TBD..0xF | This draft |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
| Reserved | Reserved | 0xF | This draft |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
spt
PS I also got some other minor nits from David that I’ll incorporate in the
next version that will pop out Sunday/Monday.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
