Hi Steve, On 16 Dec 2015, at 23:36, Stephen Kent <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tim, > > Since, as you reminded me, this is Informational, I agree that this > doc need not be co-authored as I had suggested. But the intro must > emphasize that it just documenting what RIPE has chosen to do, and > that it does not claim to be a set of recommended local cache management > design notes.
I agree. And I have no objections to a name change of the document either.. maybe: ripe-ncc-rpki-validation-implementation Tim > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
