Dear working group, Please progress. Thank you authors!
Tim > On 21 Mar 2016, at 22:20, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > A nagging reminder. There has been no comment, pro or con. > > It’s a short draft. Please do review and say whether you want the draft to > progress or not. > > If you want to see the differences in this latest version, one way is to look > at the tools page for the draft: > > draft page: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05 > side-by-side diff: > https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05.txt > > —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chair > > On Mar 9, 2016, at 6:28 AM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> As discussed in December, a new version for draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis was >> required to deal with an IESG comment on the Security Considerations section. >> >> The authors have submitted a new version and ask for a working group last >> call. >> >> This starts the wglc which will end on 23 Mar 2016. Please review the draft >> for its readiness for publication and provide comments to the list. >> >> Positive support is needed in order to judge consensus for publication, so >> please do comment on the list. >> >> The draft is available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rfc6485bis-05. >> >> —Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs >> _______________________________________________ >> sidr mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
