There was a quite similar discussion in 2013, for the thread see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/zvSP_-iiEfu_acYInK5lOMnys5U
As far as I remember w/o a final conclusion (or the conclusion was
leave it as is).
Cheers
matthias
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Thomas King wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Following up on the discussion we had during the last IETF meeting I would
> like to discuss with you how we proceed with the “Did not perform validation”
> value. I think this value is very important and should be added to
> ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling.
>
> Best regards,
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
--
Dr. Matthias Waehlisch
. Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
. Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
.. mailto:[email protected] .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
:. Also: http://inet.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
