> On Jul 21, 2016, at 11:59 AM, Sandra Murphy <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> On Jul 21, 2016, at 6:36 AM, Chris Morrow <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> We are going to officially stake: >> 1) draft-ietf-sidr-slurm > > Hasn’t had energy in a while, but not so long that I can say there’s no > possibility of resurrection. (e.g., keyroll had a two year gap in there. > But then the need was clear.) > > >> 2) draft-ietf-sidr-lta-use-cases >> >> These are not being progressed currently, and won't be in the future >> it seems. We'll do the process bits next week to remove them from >> SIDR's work queue. > > I’d like to hear from the authors (we’ve heard from Randy) whether they have > a possibility of continuing. > > And I’d think the wg has to declare there’s no interest - if there’s a > reason, and a new author volunteers…
Chris, I suppose that’s what you meant by “the process bits” —Sandy > > —Sandy > >> >> -chris > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
