> On Aug 22, 2016, at 17:03, joel jaeggli <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8/17/16 7:43 PM, Declan Ma wrote: >> Joel, >> >> When we are talking about SIDROPS, we are referring to that BGP speakers >> are resorting to RPKI relying party to get verified INR authorization >> information, which is created by CA and maintained by repository managers. >> >> IMHO, network operators are not the only RPKI role that the community is >> going to solicit input from. CA operators, repository operators, RP service >> providers all bear significance as with SIDR Operations, in identifying >> issues and sharing experiences. > Yeah there are a bunch of actors who are operators of elements other > than networks. > > RIRs and CAs spring immediately to mind. >> Although network operators could also be CA operators, repository operators, >> RP service providers, yet RIRs, CA and repository backend service providers, >> and third party RP don’t fall into the category of ‘network operators’. >> >> I would suggest the “The goals of the sidr-ops working group” be adjusted >> slightly, with CA operators, repository operators, RP service providers >> involved. > yeah I think the tent should be inclusive.
I agree with Di+Joel so +1. spt _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
