Hi Rob,
I’ll let each RIR answer for themselves. In our case (LACNIC), we
don’t support up/down. We’ve had a very rough implementation of a
‘parent’ CA for a while, but since there is essentially no demand
for it from our members, the project always gets down-prioritized.
If the GTA was to gain any traction, we’d commit resources accordingly
in order to support it from the ‘child’ side.
In short: it’s not the availability of up-down what has stalled the
GTA.
tks!
Carlos
On 8 Sep 2016, at 12:37, Rob Austein wrote:
Hi, Carlos. Technical question:
Do the current RIR CA implementations support the client role of the
"up-down" provisioning protocol, and, if so, has there been any recent
interop testing of this, either against other RIR CA implementations
or against mine?
APNIC's original implementation did support it. I think RIPE's
implementation sort of supported it at one point but they did not
consider it production-ready. Dunno about the others, and all of this
was a while ago, haven't heard much about it recently.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
