Hi Sean, > On 31 Oct 2016, at 20:06, Sean Turner <[email protected]> wrote: > > I didn’t compile it, but it looks right to me. And for what it’s worth, you > did exactly what I would have done by copying the syntax into the mainbody in > order to explain it, but imposing it directly from 3779/6268 in the module.
To be fair I took that module straight out of the thread between you and Tom :) In any case thank you very much for looking at this. Tim > > spt > >> On Oct 26, 2016, at 11:32, Tim Bruijnzeels <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Sean, Tom, Russ, and all, >> >> Sorry for bringing this up late. Technically past 25 October, and yes I >> would like to see this go through as you might expect from an author... >> >> That said, can someone with good ASN.1-fu please have look at the changes >> w.r.t. ASN.1 structure and OIDs? I tried to include all your comments >> properly - but I would feel safer if one of you could confirm. >> >> Thanks >> Tim >> >> >>> On 26 Oct 2016, at 05:13, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I read the draft once again. I support publication. >>> >>> Found a minor typo in the last paragraph on p.15 (can be dealt with during >>> RFC editor review process): >>> s/the loss of on IP address prefix from the VRS-IP/the loss of one IP >>> address prefix from the VRS-IP/ >>> >>> Sriram >>> >>> ________________________________________ >>> From: sidr <[email protected]> on behalf of Chris Morrow >>> <[email protected]> >>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 10:08 AM >>> To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] >>> Subject: [sidr] WGLC - draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered - ends >>> 10/25/2016 >>> >>> Howdy WG folks! >>> The authors of: >>> draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered >>> >>> believe they have addressed all inflight concerns/comments, the >>> request is to WGLC this, consider it's place in the world and if >>> appropriate pass this document along to the IESG for publication. >>> >>> The abstract for this draft is: >>> "This document proposes an update to the certificate validation >>> procedure specified in RFC 6487 that reduces aspects of operational >>> fragility in the management of certificates in the RPKI, while >>> retaining essential security features." >>> >>> Let's have a read through, consider and reply with your thoughts please, >>> this WGLC is set to expire: 10/25/2016 - October 25, 2016. >>> >>> thanks for reading/replying/thinking! >>> -chris >>> co-chair-persona >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sidr mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >> > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
