At Wed, 28 Dec 2016 10:55:15 +0000, tom p. wrote: > > When I saw BPKI in the Abstract, I thought 'typo'! Reading on, it > isn't; in which case, it needs expanding in the Abstract. > > Appendix A is in RelaxNG; I would like a reference for that language. > > Is Appendix A Normative? i.e. in the event of a mismatch between the > body of the I-D and Appendix A, which wins? If Appendix A, then that > reference should be Normative.
Thanks for the review! I agree with all of the above, will post revisions post-LC unless there is reason to update sooner. Yes, I think the RelaxNG schema had best be normative. We already found and fixed one minor disagreement between text and schema; unsurprisingly, running code in that case agreed with the schema. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
