Agreed. I guess you could in addition be very clear that a router that once negotiated (and/or send) BGPsec (attributes) should not be expected to always do so. This is implicitly said already, so please decide on your own if you’d like to add anymore text.
Thanks! Mirja > Am 03.01.2017 um 16:20 schrieb Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email protected]>: > > Hi! > > I don’t think there’s anything to be done, besides the guidance already in > the draft about path preference: prefer Valid paths. If the validity state > changes later, then it becomes a local policy to use or not. > > Alvaro. > >> On 1/2/17, 8:37 PM, "Randy Bush" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> it is not clear to me that this is a space where the ops doc can help >> much. i am open to ideas. >> _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
