On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:32 AM, Borchert, Oliver (Fed) < [email protected]> wrote: > > To avoid unnecessary confusion with the ambiguity of the word private, I > would change > the wording of “the (private) Member-AS Number” to “the Member-AS Number” > by > removing the wording of “(private)” within parenthesis. > This leaves the usage of private only for the signing parties private key > which I think > is well understood. > > Oliver >
I'd suggest the use of "private use" in the parenthesis instead of eliminating the word "private", and maybe add an informational reference to RFC6996 as well. If the intent that a "Member-AS Number" is to be from the private use range as defined in RFC6996, then that should be stated some place. -- =============================================== David Farmer Email:[email protected] Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
