On 4 Jan 2017, at 16:37, Sean Turner wrote:
-2: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol explicitly excludes
non-capitalized
versions of 2119 words. This draft does not. It seems different 2119
approaches among the various bgpsec draft could be confusing to the
reader.
Where’s that in draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol?
Regardless, I’m not sure that restoration will work in this draft
because there are repeated MUST requirements from other RFC and my AD
told me to not capitalize them :)
Oops, sorry, I meant to say draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops.
Maybe I misunderstand what you mean; are the non-capitalized
requirements from other drafts intended as normative for _this_ draft?
If not, then the treatment of non-capitalized 2119 words as normal
English seems to help.
Thanks!
Ben.
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
