Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-publication-10: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-publication/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I find the document to be a bit short on normative references and some implementation details. Other than that the document looks fine. My specific questions and concern are as follows: 1) Please add a normative reference for HTTP, URI and RelaxNG on first use. 2) Base64 needs a normative reference (including the section number, as there are 2 variants). 3) Section 2 says that all payloads use CMS. None of your examples show CMS. Can you please elaborate on how CMS is used. 4) How can URI of the service be discovered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- In 2.5: is the list of error reasons extensible? Was Relax NG schema validated with a tool? In Section 5 you should reference the document, as IANA registrations cut & pasted to IANA website as separate files. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
