> On Jan 19, 2017, at 9:34 AM, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi! > > I was going to wait for the author, but he has been out sick this week… L > > Picking up from Benoit’s comment – the use of “protocol” is misleading. What > is described is a process that can be followed and the necessary information > exchanged “to simplify configuration…by setting up relationships and > exchanging keying material used to authenticate those relationships.”
Is this going to be clarified in the document? Thanks, Alissa > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > >> On 1/17/17, 1:00 PM, "Alissa Cooper" <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> (1) I agree with Mirja that this document seems to be missing the actual >> protocol specification, unless Section 6 is meant to provide the >> normative specification of how the messages are to be exchanged. Is it? >> If so, I would expect that to be explicit in the document. >> >> (2) If there is in fact supposed to be a protocol specified here, I have >> the same question as I had on draft-ietf-sidr-publication, which is how >> do the entities migrate from one version to another and do version >> negotiation? >>
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
