At Sat, 04 Mar 2017 13:36:05 +0900, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The ext-comm may come from an ebgp neighbor.
ebgp neighbor? the text talks about ibgp, and about explicitly ignoring ebgp senders of this community (by default). right? > > ok. saves a character. my kind of change :) > > "Similarly, a receiving BGP speaker, in the absence of validation > state set based on local data, SHOULD derive a validations state from > the last octet of the extended community, if present." > > randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
