> In some cultures, the number 666 is supposed to be the number of “the > beast”, i.e. the devil, and therefore a sign of evil. The text > chooses this number 666 in the prefix 10.0.666.0/24 with the intent to > imply that the announcement is deliberately evil, disregarding the > fact that 666 is not a legitimate ipv4 prefix octet. > > Of course, I’m not the author, so I could be wrong.
you are, but no big deal. it could have been anything gt 255, but i knew 666 would catch the western eye. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
