> On Apr 4, 2017, at 13:18, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email protected]> wrote: > > To me, the main purpose of changing the BGPsec spec is to depend on whatever > BGP does, and not on a future extension that may or may not be in the form it > is today. However, if we keep the reference to the known standard (rfc4271), > then we should not have to update this document because we would just inherit > whatever BGP does.
This sound reasonable to me. spt _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
