> On 22 Jun 2017, at 11:24, Alvaro Retana (aretana) <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 6/22/17, 10:36 AM, "Tim Bruijnzeels" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tim: > > Hi! > >> All that said I will work on an update of this document following >> Alvaro’s review. This document will define an additional validation >> algorithm, but not update the existing one. We can finish this work >> first and then have a structured discussion about deployment - I >> propose that we take this work to SIDROPS. > > I’m assuming that you mean: finish > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered in sidr (i.e. publish as an RFC) > and then further discuss deployment in sidrops, right?
yes > >> I canceled all my meetings today so I should have updated text to >> share with my co-authors soon. Will then send a new version to >> the WG asap. > > Just a procedure note: Even though there should be a good number of changes, > I don’t think we need to run the result through the WG (as in a new WGLC). > I’m happy to allow time for anyone to comment further, either now or during > IETF LC. I just rather not officially send the document back to the WG. Works for me > > Thanks! > > Alvaro. > > > _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
