On 8/24/17, 9:55 AM, "Mirja Kühlewind" <[email protected]> wrote:
Mirja: Hi! > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Given this new mechanism seems to be the recommended way of doing things, I > would expect that this draft updates RFC 6487. Previous versions of the draft Updated that and other RFCs, but the intent is to define a new mechanism, not to replace the current one yet. After discussion, it was decided against Updating because of that. Thanks! Alvaro. _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
