Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-08: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This seems like a good change. Not knowing much about the deployment practicalities of BGP, I presume that the set of tools used for validation is sufficiently well-known that CAs will positively know when it is safe to start using the new OIDs? I found the lack of an introduction section to be odd. Please double-check this document against the I-D Nits document; and, in particular, section 2.2: <https://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist.html#anchor4> I believe "Russ Housley" is misspelled section 8. Please expand the following acronyms upon first use and in the title; see https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance. - RPKI - Resource Public Key Infrastructure - AS - Autonomous System - ROA - Route Origin Authorization - CA - Certificate Authority - CRL - Certificate Revocation List _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
