agreed. > On 28 Nov 2017, at 8:17 pm, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> > wrote: > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6487, > "A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates". > > -------------------------------------- > You may review the report below and at: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5188 > > -------------------------------------- > Type: Editorial > Reported by: Nikolai Malykh <[email protected]> > > Section: 7.1 > > Original Text > ------------- > Validation of a certificate's resource extension in the context of a > certification path (see Section 7.2 entails that for every adjacent > > > Corrected Text > -------------- > Validation of a certificate's resource extension in the context of a > certification path (see Section 7.2) entails that for every adjacent > > > Notes > ----- > The closing parenthesis is missing. > > Instructions: > ------------- > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > -------------------------------------- > RFC6487 (draft-ietf-sidr-res-certs-22) > -------------------------------------- > Title : A Profile for X.509 PKIX Resource Certificates > Publication Date : February 2012 > Author(s) : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, R. Loomans > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > Source : Secure Inter-Domain Routing > Area : Routing > Stream : IETF > Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
