yep - that looks like a genuine error - well spotted Russ!

Geoff


> On 5 Oct 2019, at 6:25 am, RFC Errata System <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8360,
> "Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation Reconsidered".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5870
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Russ Housley <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 4.2.3
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
>         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
>         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
>       }
> 
>       id-pe-autonomousSysIds OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>       ext-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 EXTENSION ::= {
>         SYNTAX ASIdentifiers
>         IDENTIFIED BY id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2
>       }
> 
>       id-pe-autonomousSysIds-v2 OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { id-pe 29 }
> 
> Notes
> -----
> The "-v2" is missing from the identifier.  It is needed for the ASN.1 module 
> to compile properly.
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8360 (draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-10)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) Validation 
> Reconsidered
> Publication Date    : April 2018
> Author(s)           : G. Huston, G. Michaelson, C. Martinez, T. Bruijnzeels, 
> A. Newton, D. Shaw
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to