> On 10 Aug 2022, at 11:17 am, John Scudder <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Aug 10, 2022, at 12:48 PM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> while i agree with the sentiment, to this amateur, this smells more like >> a bit more of a change than an erratum. > > That’s how it looks to me, too. It may be instructive to look at numbered > item 5 under > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/processing-errata-ietf-stream/ >
I agree with John here. The adding of a further constraint to the EE certificate used to sign a ROA is a material change to the interoperability of implementations pre- and post- this change. Geoff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
