The following errata report has been rejected for RFC8206,
"BGPsec Considerations for Autonomous System (AS) Migration".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7183

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Technical

Reported by: Iljitsch van Beijnum <[email protected]>
Date Reported: 2022-10-26
Rejected by: Alvaro Retana (IESG)

Section: 3

Original Text
-------------
Since SPs are using migration methods that are transparent to customers and 
therefore do not require coordination with customers, they do not have as much 
control over the length of the transition period as they might with something 
completely under their administrative control

Corrected Text
--------------
Since SPs are using migration methods that are transparent to customers and 
therefore do not require coordination with customers, they can transition at 
any time without delay.

Notes
-----
I have no corrected text. If the migration methods are transparent, how is it 
possible that SPs "do not have as much control over the length of the 
transition period as they might with something completely under their 
administrative control"? As it's transparent they would in fact have complete 
administrative control.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
   === 
This report is rejected because the current statement is correct in the context 
in which it is written.  In short, SPs and customers both need to transition 
their configurations to the new ASN.

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/6OYVQlXdJcllkB-motxDi7uuqhg/

--------------------------------------
RFC8206 (draft-ietf-sidr-as-migration-06)
--------------------------------------
Title               : BGPsec Considerations for Autonomous System (AS) Migration
Publication Date    : September 2017
Author(s)           : W. George, S. Murphy
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Secure Inter-Domain Routing
Area                : Routing
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to